Arbitration can be described as miniature versions of trials in which the rules of evidence apply (but may be waived by the parties). Like mediation, arbitration provides an alternative to resolving a dispute in court; however, arbitration differ in that the arbitrator, an impartial third party, issues a binding settlement that puts an end to a dispute and by which the parties are obligated to abide.
How Judge Emil Giordano will help you:
Given his decades of experience as both a litigator and a judge, he has dealt with thousands of cases while serving on both sides of the bench; therefore, he has the capacity to dissect and closely analyze each unique case. He strives to find a binding solution that is as satisfactory and beneficial to both parties as possible. Additionally, he is able to issue his written decision within a month.
The Counsel must offer specified evidence before the arbitration occurs. Additionally, the Counsel is obligated to stipulate to undisputed facts, provide opening declarations, and present testimony during the hearing. Furthermore, they are able to deliver closing declarations.
The mediator establishes ground rules for both parties to abide by in order to ensure complete fairness and cooperation throughout the entire mediation process.
Why should you choose Arbitration?
- It involves a just, rational process.
- It is less costly than litigation.
- It is quicker and more efficient than litigation.
- It is done confidentially.
- It is conclusive.